Obverse
Description:
A heraldic rose with the letters H and R below it is centered on the coin. "LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA" arches along the top, the split year "2004" flanks the center, and "VIENS 1 LATS" curves along the bottom.
Inscription:
LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA
20 04
VIENS 1 LATS
20 04
VIENS 1 LATS
Translation:
REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
20 04
ONE 1 LAT
20 04
ONE 1 LAT
Script: Latin
Language: Latvian
Engraver: Jānis Strupulis
Designer: Laimonis Šēnbergs
Reverse
Description:
The reverse shows a clock dial with hours and minutes in the center, and months with dates in the outer ring.
Inscription:
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31.
.IANUAR.FEBRUA .MARTƵ.APRILL. MAY . IUNY . IULY. .AUGUST. SEPT . OCTO .NOVEM.DECEM
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII
.IANUAR.FEBRUA .MARTƵ.APRILL. MAY . IUNY . IULY. .AUGUST. SEPT . OCTO .NOVEM.DECEM
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII
Translation:
January. February. March. April. May. June. July. August. September. October. November. December.
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Script: Latin
Language: Latin
Engraver: Jānis Strupulis
Designer: Laimonis Šēnbergs
Edge
Plain
Mints
| Name | Mark |
|---|---|
| Münze Österreich | — |
Mintings
| Year | Mint Mark | Mintage | Quality | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | — | 5,000 | ||
| 2004 | — | 5,000 | BU |
Historical background
In 2004, Latvia's currency situation was defined by its imminent accession to the European Union on May 1st and its long-term, but still distant, goal of adopting the euro. The national currency was the Latvian lats (LVL), which had been successfully reintroduced in 1993 following independence, replacing the temporary Latvian rublis. The lats was a symbol of national stability and sovereignty, having been pegged to the IMF's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket since 1994. This peg provided crucial stability after the hyperinflation of the early 1990s and was a cornerstone of the country's economic policy.
Politically and economically, the focus was on meeting the EU's convergence criteria (the Maastricht criteria) as a prerequisite for future euro adoption. Latvia maintained a strict fixed exchange rate regime, which functioned as a quasi-currency board, ensuring low inflation and fiscal discipline. This policy was largely successful; the economy was growing rapidly, and macroeconomic indicators were strong. However, full eurozone membership was not an immediate prospect, as the country first had to demonstrate sustained compliance with the stability criteria for a minimum of two years within the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II), a test it had not yet entered.
Consequently, 2004 was a year of preparation and alignment rather than immediate monetary change. The lats remained firmly in place, enjoying public confidence and serving as a stable foundation for EU integration. The national strategy was clear: use the stability of the fixed peg to converge with EU economies, eventually enter ERM II, and then target euro adoption, a process expected to take several more years. The immediate currency situation was thus one of stability and deliberate transition, with the lats serving as the bridge between Latvia's post-Soviet recovery and its future within the core of the European monetary project.
Politically and economically, the focus was on meeting the EU's convergence criteria (the Maastricht criteria) as a prerequisite for future euro adoption. Latvia maintained a strict fixed exchange rate regime, which functioned as a quasi-currency board, ensuring low inflation and fiscal discipline. This policy was largely successful; the economy was growing rapidly, and macroeconomic indicators were strong. However, full eurozone membership was not an immediate prospect, as the country first had to demonstrate sustained compliance with the stability criteria for a minimum of two years within the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II), a test it had not yet entered.
Consequently, 2004 was a year of preparation and alignment rather than immediate monetary change. The lats remained firmly in place, enjoying public confidence and serving as a stable foundation for EU integration. The national strategy was clear: use the stability of the fixed peg to converge with EU economies, eventually enter ERM II, and then target euro adoption, a process expected to take several more years. The immediate currency situation was thus one of stability and deliberate transition, with the lats serving as the bridge between Latvia's post-Soviet recovery and its future within the core of the European monetary project.
💎 Very Rare