In 2016, Croatia was in a period of monetary transition, still operating with the kuna (HRK) as its national currency but with a clear strategic path toward adopting the euro. The country had joined the European Union in July 2013, which legally obligated it to eventually replace the kuna with the single currency once it met the strict convergence criteria (the Maastricht criteria). Throughout 2016, the Croatian National Bank maintained a stable exchange rate regime, managing the kuna within a narrow band against the euro, which acted as its de facto anchor. This stability was crucial for economic confidence, tourism, and foreign investment, but it also limited independent monetary policy tools.
The broader economic context was one of cautious recovery from a prolonged recession. Public debt remained high, exceeding 80% of GDP, which was a significant hurdle on the path to euro adoption. While inflation was low and the budget deficit was being gradually reduced, the government faced the challenge of balancing fiscal consolidation with the need to stimulate growth. The debate within Croatia was less about
if the euro would be adopted, but
when and under what conditions, with many viewing it as a necessary step for deeper integration and long-term stability.
Consequently, 2016 was a year of preparation and assessment. The government and central bank were actively working on meeting the technical and legal prerequisites for joining the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II), the mandatory "waiting room" for euro adoption. Public opinion was divided, with proponents arguing the euro would lower transaction costs, eliminate exchange rate risk, and boost investment, while opponents expressed concerns about loss of sovereignty and potential negative impacts on tourism and exports. The year ultimately set the stage for the more accelerated push toward eurozone entry that would follow in subsequent years.