Obverse
Description:
A princess holding a hedgehog in her apron, with LATVIJA above and 2016 below.
Inscription:
LATVIJA 2016
Script: Latin
Engraver: Ligita Franckeviča
Designer: Gundega Muzikante
Reverse
Description:
The reverse depicts a hedgehog leading pigs, with an ethnographic building fragment on the right. The top features "5 EURO," and the bottom is inscribed EŽA KAŽOCIŅŠ (HEDGEHOG'S COAT).
Inscription:
5 EURO
EŽA KAŽOCIŅŠ
EŽA KAŽOCIŅŠ
Translation:
5 EURO
EŽA KAŽOCIŅŠ
EŽA KAŽOCIŅŠ
Script: Latin
Language: Latvian
Engraver: Ligita Franckeviča
Designer: Gundega Muzikante
Edge
Plain
Mints
| Name | Mark |
|---|---|
| Lithuanian Mint | — |
Mintings
| Year | Mint Mark | Mintage | Quality | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 10,000 | Proof |
Historical background
In 2016, Latvia was in its third year as a member of the Eurozone, having adopted the euro on January 1, 2014. This transition from the lat (LVL) was a strategic political and economic milestone, solidifying the country's integration with core European institutions following its EU accession in 2004. The primary domestic motivation was to enhance economic stability, attract foreign investment, and eliminate currency exchange risks with its major trading partners, particularly other Eurozone members and the broader EU. By 2016, the euro was fully embedded in daily life, with public opinion, initially skeptical, having largely accepted the new currency as a symbol of Latvia's "return to Europe."
The macroeconomic context in 2016 was one of cautious stability but with underlying vulnerabilities. Latvia's economy was growing at a moderate pace, but it remained one of the poorer Eurozone members, with income levels below the EU average. A key ongoing concern was the risk of money laundering within the financial system, a legacy issue from the post-Soviet era that gained international scrutiny. While not a direct currency issue, this reputational risk had implications for financial stability and investor confidence within the single currency framework. Furthermore, Latvia continued to benefit from Eurozone membership through lower interest rates and enhanced trade, but it also had to adhere to the bloc's strict fiscal rules, limiting budgetary flexibility.
Internationally, Latvia's euro membership positioned it within the broader debates and challenges facing the Eurozone in 2016. The aftermath of the Greek debt crisis and the migration crisis were testing European solidarity. As a small, open economy on the EU's eastern frontier, Latvia's perspective within Eurozone discussions often emphasized fiscal discipline and geopolitical security, particularly in light of heightened tensions with Russia following the annexation of Crimea in 2014. Thus, in 2016, the currency situation was not one of transition or crisis for Latvia, but rather one of consolidated membership within a larger monetary union navigating significant political and economic headwinds.
The macroeconomic context in 2016 was one of cautious stability but with underlying vulnerabilities. Latvia's economy was growing at a moderate pace, but it remained one of the poorer Eurozone members, with income levels below the EU average. A key ongoing concern was the risk of money laundering within the financial system, a legacy issue from the post-Soviet era that gained international scrutiny. While not a direct currency issue, this reputational risk had implications for financial stability and investor confidence within the single currency framework. Furthermore, Latvia continued to benefit from Eurozone membership through lower interest rates and enhanced trade, but it also had to adhere to the bloc's strict fiscal rules, limiting budgetary flexibility.
Internationally, Latvia's euro membership positioned it within the broader debates and challenges facing the Eurozone in 2016. The aftermath of the Greek debt crisis and the migration crisis were testing European solidarity. As a small, open economy on the EU's eastern frontier, Latvia's perspective within Eurozone discussions often emphasized fiscal discipline and geopolitical security, particularly in light of heightened tensions with Russia following the annexation of Crimea in 2014. Thus, in 2016, the currency situation was not one of transition or crisis for Latvia, but rather one of consolidated membership within a larger monetary union navigating significant political and economic headwinds.
💎 Very Rare