Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Museums Victoria / CC-BY
Context
Years: 1955–1963
Issuer: East Africa
Currency:
(1921—1967)
Demonetized: Yes
Total mintage: 40,600,000
Material
Diameter: 25.3 mm
Weight: 5.67 g
Thickness: 1.5 mm
Composition: Bronze
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard37
Numista: #7545

Obverse

Description:
Central hole separates crown and value, encircled by legend.
Inscription:
QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND

FIVE

CENTS

K M
Script: Latin

Reverse

Description:
Curved tusks frame the central opening.
Inscription:
EAST AFRICA

5

1957
Script: Latin

Edge

Plain

Categories

Symbol> Crown


Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
19552,000,000
1955Proof
1955H4,000,000
1955HProof
1955KN2,000,000
1956KNProof
1956H3,000,000
1956KN3,000,000
1957KN5,000,000
1957H5,000,000
1961H4,000,000
196312,600,000
1963Proof

Historical background

In 1955, the currency landscape of East Africa was defined by the dominance of the East African Shilling, managed by the East African Currency Board (EABC). Established in 1919 and reformed in the post-war period, the EABC provided a stable and unified currency for the British territories of Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, and Zanzibar. This system was a classic colonial currency board, where the local shilling was fully sterling-backed, ensuring fixed parity with the British Pound and facilitating seamless trade with the metropole. For colonial administrators and the significant European settler and Asian merchant communities, this arrangement provided monetary stability and predictability for export-oriented economies.

However, this imposed uniformity masked underlying economic tensions and political aspirations. The currency board system was inherently conservative, prioritizing the convertibility of the shilling into sterling over the ability to direct credit for local developmental needs. Monetary policy was effectively set in London, with no capacity for independent interest rate management or discretionary lending to foster regional industrialisation. Furthermore, while the shilling circulated uniformly, the benefits of the integrated economy were unevenly distributed, largely favouring the settler-dominated production centres in Kenya and the colonial administrative framework.

By the mid-1950s, this system existed in a state of advanced but quiet transition. The winds of political change were unmistakably blowing, with the Mau Mau Uprising in Kenya (1952-1960) underscoring the demand for self-determination. While formal independence for Tanganyika (1961), Uganda (1962), and Kenya (1963) still lay a few years ahead, the currency board's future was already in question. Discussions among emerging local elites and economists had begun to critically assess the limitations of a monetary system that could not serve sovereign national development goals. Thus, 1955 represents the late colonial peak of a unified currency, operating efficiently on the surface but facing an inevitable dissolution as the region moved decisively toward political independence and economic sovereignty.
🌱 Very Common