Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Museums Victoria / CC-BY
Context
Years: 1954–1963
Issuer: East Africa
Currency:
(1921—1967)
Demonetized: Yes
Total mintage: 25,920,000
Material
Diameter: 21 mm
Weight: 3.89 g
Thickness: 1.56 mm
Shape: Round
Composition: Copper-nickel
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard36
Numista: #2864

Obverse

Description:
Queen Elizabeth II crowned portrait facing right, surrounded by legend.
Inscription:
QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND

CT
Script: Latin
Engraver: Cecil Thomas

Reverse

Description:
Lion on mountain. Mintmark below lion at grass line, value beneath. Central image encircled by English text.
Inscription:
EAST AFRICA

50

FIFTY CENTS 1954 HALF SHILLING
Script: Latin

Edge

Reeded


Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
19543,720,000
1954Proof
1955H1,600,000
1955HProof
1955KHN
1955KN
1956H2,000,000
1956HProof
1956KHN
1956KN2,000,000
1958H2,600,000
1958KHN
19604,000,000
1962KN4,000,000
19636,000,000

Historical background

In 1954, East Africa’s currency landscape was defined by the East African Shilling, a unified currency managed by the East African Currency Board (EACB). Established in 1919 and headquartered in London, the EACB served the British territories of Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, and Zanzibar. The system was a classic colonial currency board arrangement, where the local currency was fully backed by sterling reserves held in London and pegged at a fixed rate to the British Pound. This ensured stability and facilitated trade within the region and with the British Empire, but it also meant monetary policy was entirely subordinated to the needs of the sterling area, with no independent capacity to address local economic conditions.

The period was one of apparent stability but underlying tension. The post-World War II economic boom and commodity exports like coffee, cotton, and sisal supported the currency's credibility. However, the system drew criticism for its inherent colonial structure. The pooling of reserves in London was seen as a drain of capital from the colonies, limiting local investment. Furthermore, the benefits of a common currency were uneven, often favouring Kenya, which had a more developed settler economy and was the region's commercial hub. This created friction among the territories, each with differing economic priorities and stages of development.

By the mid-1950s, the political winds were shifting with the rise of nationalist movements across the region. While the currency board would continue to operate for over a decade, the demands for self-government and economic autonomy began to question its future. The year 1954 thus represents the late colonial peak of a unified monetary system, operating efficiently on the surface but increasingly at odds with the political and economic aspirations of the territories it served, foreshadowing its eventual dissolution into separate national currencies after independence.
🌱 Very Common