Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Museums Victoria / CC-BY
Context
Years: 1954–1962
Issuer: East Africa
Currency:
(1921—1967)
Demonetized: Yes
Total mintage: 102,600,000
Material
Diameter: 20 mm
Weight: 1.94 g
Thickness: 1 mm
Composition: Bronze
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard35
Numista: #5818

Obverse

Description:
Center hole separates crown and denomination. Mint letter(s) tiny below hole.
Inscription:
QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND

H

ONE CENT
Script: Latin

Reverse

Description:
Curved tusks frame the central opening.
Inscription:
EAST AFRICA

1

1959
Script: Latin

Edge

Plain

Categories

Symbol> Crown


Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
19548,000,000
1954Proof
1955KN4,000,000
19555,000,000
1955H6,384,000
1956H15,616,000
1956KN9,680,000
1957H5,000,000
195715,000,000
1957KN
1959H10,000,000
1959KN10,000,000
19611,800,000
1961Proof
1961H1,800,000
1962H10,320,000

Historical background

In 1954, East Africa’s currency landscape was defined by the East African Shilling, a unified currency managed by the East African Currency Board (EACB). Established in 1919 and headquartered in London, the EACB served the British territories of Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, and Zanzibar. The system was a classic colonial currency board arrangement, where the local currency was fully backed by sterling reserves held in London and pegged at a fixed rate to the British Pound. This ensured stability and facilitated trade within the region and with the British Empire, but it also meant monetary policy was entirely subordinated to the needs of the sterling area, with no independent capacity to address local economic conditions.

The period was one of apparent stability but underlying tension. The post-World War II economic boom and commodity exports like coffee, cotton, and sisal supported the currency's credibility. However, the system drew criticism for its inherent colonial structure. The pooling of reserves in London was seen as a drain of capital from the colonies, limiting local investment. Furthermore, the benefits of a common currency were uneven, often favouring Kenya, which had a more developed settler economy and was the region's commercial hub. This created friction among the territories, each with differing economic priorities and stages of development.

By the mid-1950s, the political winds were shifting with the rise of nationalist movements across the region. While the currency board would continue to operate for over a decade, the demands for self-government and economic autonomy began to question its future. The year 1954 thus represents the late colonial peak of a unified monetary system, operating efficiently on the surface but increasingly at odds with the political and economic aspirations of the territories it served, foreshadowing its eventual dissolution into separate national currencies after independence.
🌱 Very Common