In 1791, Denmark operated under a complex and strained monetary system, a legacy of the previous century's economic policies. The state was officially on a silver standard, with the
rigsdaler as the primary unit of account. However, decades of war financing and deficit spending had led to the proliferation of various forms of money, including overvalued "credit" coins made of less valuable metals and a substantial volume of inconvertible paper money issued by the state-run
Kurantbanken. This created a dual system: the reliable
specie rigsdaler (backed by silver) and the depreciated
kurant rigsdaler (paper and credit coins), which traded at a significant discount against silver.
The situation was a source of economic friction and confusion. The fixed exchange rate between the silver and kurant rigsdaler was artificially maintained by royal decree, but market realities consistently undermined it, leading to a thriving black market for currency exchange. This disparity disrupted trade, as merchants and the public struggled with the real value of payments. Furthermore, the large amount of circulating paper money, without sufficient silver reserves to back it, created persistent inflationary pressures and undermined confidence in the state's finances.
This unstable environment placed Denmark within a broader European context of monetary experimentation and strain following the Seven Years' War. The government in Copenhagen, under the absolute monarchy, was acutely aware of the problems but faced the difficult task of reform without triggering a financial crisis or public unrest. The year 1791 thus represents a point of simmering tension within the Danish economy, setting the stage for more definitive—and ultimately disruptive—monetary reforms that would be attempted later in the decade.