Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Heritage Auctions
Context
Years: 1866–1870
Issuer: France Issuer flag
Currency:
(1795—1959)
Demonetization: 22 March 1918
Total mintage: 25,973,328
Material
Diameter: 27 mm
Weight: 10 g
Silver weight: 8.35 g
Thickness: 1.8 mm
Shape: Round
Composition: 83.5% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Coin alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↓
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard807
Numista: #1176
Value
Bullion value: $24.07

Obverse

Description:
Laureate facing left
Inscription:
NAPOLEON III EMPEREUR

BARRE
Translation:
NAPOLEON III EMPEROR

BARRE
Script: Latin
Language: French

Reverse

Description:
Arms flank value, date beneath.
Inscription:
EMPIRE FRANCAIS

2 F

1868
Translation:
FRENCH EMPIRE

2 F

1868
Script: Latin
Language: French

Edge

Reeded

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
1866A3,225,798
1866BB3,089,824
1866E
1866K437,055
1867A3,312,543
1867BB3,470,737
1867K1,743,984
1868A3,672,479
1868BB733,077
1868K
1869A1,104,428
1869BB1,368,080
1870A3,815,323
1870BB

Historical background

In 1866, France operated under a bimetallic monetary system, established by the Latin Monetary Union (LMU) treaty of 1865. This agreement, which included Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, and later Greece, standardized coinage by fixing the gold-to-silver ratio at 1:15.5. The goal was to create a stable, uniform currency zone that would facilitate trade and economic integration across participating nations. French coins like the gold Napoléon and the silver 5-franc piece were legal tender throughout the union, representing a significant step toward European monetary cooperation.

However, this system faced profound structural pressures. The fixed mint ratio did not reflect the fluctuating market values of the metals, particularly as new silver discoveries in the Americas increased its supply and drove its market price down. This created Gresham's Law in practice: cheaper silver flooded into the LMU mints to be coined at the artificially high rate, while gold coins were increasingly hoarded or exported. Consequently, France was effectively draining its gold reserves to support an overvalued silver currency, placing the entire bimetallic framework under severe strain.

The situation in 1866 was therefore one of precarious transition. While the LMU promised stability, the inherent flaws of bimetallism were becoming untenable. French monetary authorities, led by the Banque de France, were grappling with the practical reality that the system was evolving toward a gold standard de facto, even as the law upheld bimetallism de jure. This period set the stage for the eventual, though reluctant, shift of France and the LMU toward a gold-based system in the following decades, as the international monetary order began to coalesce around gold.
🌱 Very Common