By 1975, the Soviet Union's currency situation was characterized by a stark duality between a stable, but largely meaningless, official ruble and a vibrant, repressed shadow economy. Officially, the State Bank (Gosbank) maintained strict control, with the ruble's exchange rate artificially set at 0.75 rubles to 1 US dollar—a figure disconnected from economic reality. This "wooden ruble" was non-convertible, meaning it could not be legally exchanged for foreign currency or taken out of the country, isolating the Soviet financial system from the global market. Internally, wages and prices for basic goods were centrally fixed, creating an illusion of stability and shielding the population from inflation, which was instead manifested as chronic shortages.
Beneath this controlled facade, a complex second economy operated, giving the ruble its true, variable value. Due to perennial deficits of quality goods and services, citizens routinely turned to the
rynok (collective farm markets), the black market, or blat (personal connections) to obtain anything from meat and jeans to automobile parts. Here, effective prices were significantly higher than state prices. Furthermore, a special sector existed for privileged elites and foreigners, where goods were available for "certificate rubles" or hard currency in
Beryozka stores, creating a two-tiered consumption society. The ruble's real purchasing power was thus highly situational, depending entirely on whether one was accessing the empty state system or the costly informal one.
This unstable equilibrium was under growing strain in the mid-1970s. While the Brezhnev era's "Era of Stagnation" saw little official economic reform, increased détente and foreign trade, partly financed by soaring oil exports following the 1973 crisis, brought more hard currency into state coffers. However, it also heightened the contradictions of a non-convertible currency in international dealings. The state relied on complex bilateral trade agreements and used an artificial "transferable ruble" for Comecon accounting, but the fundamental weakness of the monetary system was becoming more apparent. The currency situation of 1975, therefore, reflected the broader Soviet economic paradox: surface-level stability maintained by rigid controls, underpinned by growing inefficiencies and a thriving informal economy that increasingly defined daily life.