Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Stacks Bowers
Mexico
Context
Years: 1905–1918
Country: Mexico Country flag
Currency:
(since 1915)
Demonetized: Yes
Material
Diameter: 30 mm
Weight: 14.5 g
Silver weight: 14.50 g
Shape: Round
Composition: Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Cast
Alignment: Coin alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↓
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard766
Numista: #63312
Value
Bullion value: $41.02

Obverse

Description:
National arms design on a standard 50 Centavos coin, KM#445.
Inscription:
ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS
Translation:
United Mexican States
Script: Latin
Language: Spanish

Reverse

Description:
Value encircled
Inscription:
50

CENTAVOS
Script: Latin

Edge

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection

Historical background

In 1905, the State of Sinaloa, like much of Mexico, operated within a complex and often chaotic monetary system that was a direct legacy of the Porfiriato—the long dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz. The official currency was the silver Peso, minted at the famous Casa de Moneda in Mexico City, and it was theoretically tied to the international silver standard. However, the reality on the ground was one of severe scarcity of official coinage, especially in a burgeoning agricultural and mining state like Sinaloa. This shortage crippled everyday commerce and the payment of wages, particularly for the vast workforce in the state's profitable farms, mines, and railroads.

To fill this vacuum, a patchwork of substitute currencies circulated widely. The most prominent were bilimbiques—private paper notes issued by haciendas, mining companies, and local merchants. These notes were essentially IOUs, redeemable only for goods at the company store (tienda de raya), creating a system of debt peonage that bound workers to their employers. Alongside these, foreign coins, especially U.S. gold dollars and silver pesos, were commonly used in port cities like Mazatlán for larger commercial transactions and international trade. This resulted in a multi-currency environment where the value and acceptance of money were highly localized and unstable.

The situation underscored the central government's limited reach and the economic power of regional elites. While the Díaz regime promoted modernization and foreign investment, its failure to provide a uniform and sufficient circulating medium left Sinaloa's economy dependent on private, often exploitative, substitutes. This monetary fragmentation would contribute to the widespread economic discontent that fueled the coming Mexican Revolution, as workers and small farmers grew increasingly resentful of a system that controlled both their labor and the very money they were paid.
Legendary