5 Euro ("The White Book" by Janis Jaunsudrabins) – Latvia
Non-circulating coins
Commemoration: The 100th anniversary of "The White Book" by Janis Jaunsudrabins
Latvia
Context
Material
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard160
Numista: #61340
Value
Exchange value: 5 EUR = $5.91
Bullion value: $68.30
Inflation-adjusted value: 7.38 EUR
Obverse
Description:
The obverse depicts the cover of Jaunsudrabiņš' *White Book* with clouds. The inscription LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA runs down the right side, with 2014 on the left. A homestead illustration from the book forms the square background, and "5 euro" is at the bottom right.
Inscription:
2014
LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA
5 euro
LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA
5 euro
Translation:
2014
REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
5 euro
REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
5 euro
Designer: Sandra Krastiņa
Reverse
Description:
The reverse displays the book's cover with its Gothic title and 1914, set against a square background showing an illustration from the book of a boy in sunlight. A facsimile of the author's signature appears at the bottom.
Inscription:
Baltà
grahmata
1914
Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš
grahmata
1914
Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš
Translation:
Baltā
grāmatā
1914
Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš
grāmatā
1914
Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš
Language: Latvian
Designer: Sandra Krastiņa
Edge
Plain
Categories
| Art> Literature |
Mints
| Name | Mark |
|---|---|
| Royal Dutch Mint | — |
Mintings
| Year | Mint Mark | Mintage | Quality | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | — | 5,000 | Proof |
Historical background
In 2014, Latvia was in a unique and transitional currency situation, having just adopted the euro on January 1st of that year. This marked the culmination of a long-stated strategic goal following its accession to the European Union in 2004 and recovery from a severe financial crisis in 2008-2009. The country replaced its previous currency, the Latvian lats (LVL), which had been a strong symbol of national identity since its reintroduction after independence from the Soviet Union. The switch was driven by a desire for deeper economic integration with the Eurozone core, aiming to secure greater financial stability, attract foreign investment, and lower borrowing costs for the state and businesses.
The transition itself was technically smooth, with a two-week dual-circulation period. However, it was met with significant public ambivalence. Polls consistently showed a majority of Latvians opposed the change, driven by concerns over a loss of sovereignty, fears of hidden price increases (despite strict conversion rules), and sentimental attachment to the lats. The political elite, however, remained overwhelmingly in favor, viewing euro adoption as a final step in Latvia's "return to Europe" and a strategic move to distance itself from the economic and political influence of Russia—a consideration that gained immense urgency later in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea.
Thus, Latvia's 2014 currency situation was defined by its first full year operating within the Eurozone. The macroeconomic rationale was clear: it locked in the fiscal discipline of the post-crisis years and provided a stable currency platform. Yet, the year also highlighted the complex blend of economic pragmatism and geopolitical calculation behind the move, set against a backdrop of lingering public skepticism. The timing proved historically significant, as the geopolitical shocks later that year underscored the importance of Latvia's anchored position within the core European monetary and political bloc.
The transition itself was technically smooth, with a two-week dual-circulation period. However, it was met with significant public ambivalence. Polls consistently showed a majority of Latvians opposed the change, driven by concerns over a loss of sovereignty, fears of hidden price increases (despite strict conversion rules), and sentimental attachment to the lats. The political elite, however, remained overwhelmingly in favor, viewing euro adoption as a final step in Latvia's "return to Europe" and a strategic move to distance itself from the economic and political influence of Russia—a consideration that gained immense urgency later in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea.
Thus, Latvia's 2014 currency situation was defined by its first full year operating within the Eurozone. The macroeconomic rationale was clear: it locked in the fiscal discipline of the post-crisis years and provided a stable currency platform. Yet, the year also highlighted the complex blend of economic pragmatism and geopolitical calculation behind the move, set against a backdrop of lingering public skepticism. The timing proved historically significant, as the geopolitical shocks later that year underscored the importance of Latvia's anchored position within the core European monetary and political bloc.
💎 Very Rare