In 1862, Sweden’s currency system was in a state of transition, firmly anchored to the silver standard. The
riksdaler riksmynt was the official unit of account, but the monetary landscape was complex and fragmented. Alongside government-issued notes from the Riksbank, there was a significant circulation of private banknotes issued by numerous
enskilda banker (private commercial banks). This multiplicity of issuers, while facilitating credit and economic activity, created concerns over uniformity and trust, as the value and acceptance of these private notes could vary.
The period was also marked by a chronic shortage of small-denomination coinage, which severely hampered everyday transactions. To fill this gap, a widespread and unofficial system of
token coins and private
myntsedlar (coin notes) issued by merchants and factories circulated locally. This practice, though a practical necessity, highlighted the state’s inability to provide a sufficient and uniform metallic currency for the entire economy, leading to inefficiency and confusion in trade.
These issues were part of a broader ongoing debate about monetary reform. The 1850s had seen the establishment of the Scandinavian Monetary Union (with Denmark and Norway) planned for 1873, which would eventually replace the silver-based riksdaler with the gold-based krona. Therefore, 1862 represents a point where Sweden was grappling with the practical shortcomings of its old system while moving deliberately, albeit slowly, toward the modern, standardized, and state-controlled currency system that the union promised.