In 1933, Nepal's currency situation was characterized by a complex and evolving dual system, deeply tied to its political relationship with British India. The primary circulating medium was the
Nepalese mohar, but the economy was practically dominated by the
Indian rupee. This was a result of the 1924 Nepal-Britain Treaty, which fixed the exchange rate at 1 Indian rupee = 1.5 Nepalese mohars. The Indian rupee was not only legal tender within Nepal but was essential for all foreign trade, which was almost exclusively conducted with India. This created a de facto currency board system, where Nepal's money supply was effectively backed by and dependent on Indian rupee reserves held by the Nepal government.
Internally, the monetary system was somewhat fragmented. While the government minted silver mohars and copper paisas, the value and acceptance of these coins could vary. Furthermore, the
Nepal Rastra Bank, the country's central bank, would not be established for another two decades (1956), meaning there was no unified authority to regulate currency or conduct monetary policy. The government's treasury, under the direct control of the Rana Prime Minister, managed the nation's finances and foreign exchange reserves, which were largely accumulated from the pensions of Gurkha soldiers serving in the British Indian Army—a critical source of hard currency.
The year 1933 itself fell within a period of relative monetary stability under the Rana regime, but the system's inherent vulnerabilities were clear. Nepal's economy and currency were inextricably linked to India's, leaving it exposed to shifts in the Indian economy and monetary policy. This subordinate currency relationship reflected Nepal's broader geopolitical and economic dependence during this era, setting the stage for future monetary reforms and the eventual push for financial sovereignty in the mid-20th century.