Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Numismatics.hu
Context
Years: 1691–1702
Issuer: Hungary Issuer flag
Ruler: Leopold I
Currency:
(1526—1754)
Demonetized: Yes
Material
Composition: Silver
Magnetic: No
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard221
Numista: #48119

Obverse

Description:
Crowned arms divide N-B, within pearl circle. Nagybánya mint.
Inscription:
LEOPOLDVS · D · G · R · I · S · A · H · B · REX ·

N B
Script: Latin

Reverse

Description:
A non-radiant Madonna, crowned and holding the child on her right arm, breaks through a pearl circle. The date concludes the inscription.
Inscription:
PATRONA · HUNGARIÆ · 1703 ·
Script: Latin

Edge

Plain

Mints

NameMark
Baia MareNB

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
1691N-B
1693N-B
1695N-B
1698N-B
1699N-B
1700N-B
1701N-B
1702N-B

Historical background

In 1691, Hungary’s currency situation was chaotic and deeply influenced by the ongoing Great Turkish War (1683-1699). The Habsburg monarchy, which controlled the majority of "Royal Hungary," was financing its massive military campaigns against the Ottoman Empire primarily through heavy taxation and the debasement of coinage. The imperial authorities in Vienna, notably under Leopold I, repeatedly reduced the silver content in coins minted for use in Hungary, such as the denarius and the tallér (thaler). This led to severe inflation, a loss of public confidence in the currency, and widespread economic hardship in a kingdom already devastated by decades of warfare and occupation.

The monetary landscape was further complicated by the circulation of a bewildering variety of coins. Alongside the debased new Habsburg issues, older, higher-quality Hungarian coins from before the wars, Ottoman akçe, Dutch thalers, and other foreign currencies circulated simultaneously. This created a complex and unstable exchange environment where the intrinsic metal value of a coin often far exceeded its nominal face value, leading to hoarding of good coinage and the rapid spending of debased money—a classic example of Gresham’s Law. The Habsburgs' attempts to impose arbitrary exchange rates by decree failed to stabilize the situation, instead fostering a thriving black market for currency exchange.

This financial instability exacerbated social and political tensions within Hungary. The debasement was effectively a form of war tax that disproportionately burdened the Hungarian population, including the nobility. It fueled resentment against Habsburg fiscal policies and centralized control, contributing to the growing discontent that would later erupt in the anti-Habsburg uprising led by Prince Francis II Rákóczi in 1703. Thus, the currency crisis of 1691 was not merely an economic issue but a key political grievance, undermining the relationship between the Hungarian estates and the Viennese court during a critical period of national reconquest and re-integration.
Legendary