Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Coinsberg

50 Dirhams (Sharjah City for Humanitarian Services) – United Arab Emirates

Non-circulating coins
Commemoration: The 25th Anniversary of Sharjah City for Humanitarian Services
United Arab Emirates
Context
Year: 2004
Currency:
(since 1973)
Total mintage: 2,000
Material
Diameter: 40 mm
Weight: 40 g
Silver weight: 37.00 g
Shape: Round
Composition: 92.5% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard71
Numista: #91936
Value
Exchange value: 50 AED
Bullion value: $107.32

Obverse

Description:
Country name with Arabic script denomination.
Inscription:
الامارات العربية المتحدة

٥٠

درهماً

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Translation:
Fifty

Dirhams

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Scripts: Arabic, Latin
Language: Arabic

Reverse

Description:
SCHS logo with stylized "25"
Inscription:
25

مدينة الشارقة للخدمات الإنسانية

Sharjah City for Humanitarian Services

1979 - 2004
Translation:
City of Sharjah for Humanitarian Services

1979 - 2004
Scripts: Arabic, Latin
Language: Arabic

Edge

Reeded

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
20042,000Proof

Historical background

In 2004, the currency situation in the United Arab Emirates was defined by its long-standing and stable peg to the United States Dollar. This policy, formally established in 1997, fixed the UAE Dirham (AED) at a rate of approximately 3.6725 per USD. This peg was a cornerstone of the country's economic policy, providing crucial stability for an economy heavily reliant on oil exports (priced in dollars) and foreign investment, while also anchoring low inflation and facilitating international trade and finance.

The context of 2004, however, was marked by growing regional debate and external pressures. With the US Federal Reserve maintaining low interest rates to stimulate the economy, the UAE and other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states were effectively importing an accommodative monetary policy that was increasingly misaligned with their own booming, oil-fueled economies. This contributed to rising domestic inflation and asset prices, particularly in real estate, while diminishing the returns on local currency deposits. Furthermore, there was public discussion about the potential for a collective GCC currency union, which was then targeted for 2010, raising questions about the future of the individual dollar pegs.

Consequently, while the peg itself remained unwavering and unquestioned in its immediate application throughout 2004, it was a period of underlying economic tension and forward-looking policy discussion. The UAE authorities consistently reaffirmed their commitment to the dollar peg as a source of stability, even as economists began to more openly weigh its costs against its benefits. The situation set the stage for subsequent years of increasing inflationary pressure and intensified debate that would eventually lead the UAE to reaffirm its individual peg decisively when the GCC currency union project stalled.
Legendary