5000 Lei (Christianity) – Romania
Non-circulating coins
Commemoration: 2000 Years of Christianity
Romania
Context
Material
Diameter: 35 mm
Weight: 31.1 g
Gold weight: 31.07 g
Shape: Round
Composition: 99.9% Gold
Standard: Silver ounce
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard182
Numista: #83767
Value
Exchange value: 5000 ROL
Bullion value: $5180.13
Inflation-adjusted value: 40168.80 ROL
Obverse
Description:
Romania's Coat of Arms, the year "2000," "ROMANIA," and "5000 LEI" are inscribed around the edge. The center features a stylized cross containing ancient Christian symbols: a fish-shaped lamp and two plates. One plate bears the Latin inscription "EGO ZENOVIUS VOTUM POSUI," and the other the monogram of Jesus. Two groups of three stylized crosses are engraved around it.
Inscription:
2000
ROMANIA
5000 LEI
EGO ZENOVIUS VOTUM POSUI
ROMANIA
5000 LEI
EGO ZENOVIUS VOTUM POSUI
Translation:
I, Zenovius, placed this vow.
Script: Latin
Language: Latin
Reverse
Description:
Jesus Christ; circular inscriptions "2000 DE ANI DE CRESTINISM" and "COMEMORAREA MILENIULUI" separated by cross ornaments.
Inscription:
2000 DE ANI DE CRESTINISM
COMEMORAREA MILENIULUI
COMEMORAREA MILENIULUI
Script: Latin
Edge
Plain
Mintings
| Year | Mint Mark | Mintage | Quality | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | — | 1,000 | Proof |
Historical background
In the year 2000, Romania's currency situation was characterized by a fragile stabilization following a period of severe crisis. The late 1990s had been tumultuous, culminating in a deep economic and banking crisis in 1998-1999, which severely undermined confidence in the Romanian leu (ROL). This led to high inflation, a significant depreciation of the currency, and the effective collapse of the banking system for many citizens. By the turn of the millennium, the country was operating under a standby agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which imposed strict austerity measures and required a tight monetary policy from the National Bank of Romania (NBR) to restore macroeconomic balance.
The primary focus of monetary authorities in 2000 was on curbing rampant inflation and preventing further dramatic devaluation. Inflation remained stubbornly high, ending the year at approximately 45%, though this was a notable decrease from the triple-digit hyperinflation of the mid-1990s. The NBR maintained a managed float exchange rate regime, intervening in the market to smooth out excessive volatility, but the leu continued to depreciate gradually under pressure from fiscal deficits and lingering lack of confidence. This environment of high inflation and a weakening currency severely eroded purchasing power, creating ongoing hardship for the population.
Looking forward, 2000 was a transitional year setting the stage for more decisive reforms. The government, under renewed IMF pressure, began implementing stricter fiscal discipline and accelerated the restructuring and privatization of loss-making state-owned enterprises. These steps, though painful in the short term, were aimed at creating the conditions for sustainable growth and eventual EU accession. The currency stability achieved was precarious, but it laid the necessary groundwork for the more successful stabilization and denomination (the replacement of the old leu with a new leu at a rate of 10,000:1) that would follow later in the decade.
The primary focus of monetary authorities in 2000 was on curbing rampant inflation and preventing further dramatic devaluation. Inflation remained stubbornly high, ending the year at approximately 45%, though this was a notable decrease from the triple-digit hyperinflation of the mid-1990s. The NBR maintained a managed float exchange rate regime, intervening in the market to smooth out excessive volatility, but the leu continued to depreciate gradually under pressure from fiscal deficits and lingering lack of confidence. This environment of high inflation and a weakening currency severely eroded purchasing power, creating ongoing hardship for the population.
Looking forward, 2000 was a transitional year setting the stage for more decisive reforms. The government, under renewed IMF pressure, began implementing stricter fiscal discipline and accelerated the restructuring and privatization of loss-making state-owned enterprises. These steps, though painful in the short term, were aimed at creating the conditions for sustainable growth and eventual EU accession. The currency stability achieved was precarious, but it laid the necessary groundwork for the more successful stabilization and denomination (the replacement of the old leu with a new leu at a rate of 10,000:1) that would follow later in the decade.
✨ Legendary