Logo Title
obverse
reverse
spica
Latvia
Context
Year: 2007
Issuer: Latvia Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1991)
Currency:
(1993—2013)
Demonetization: 1 January 2014
Total mintage: 2,007
Material
Diameter: 38.61 mm
Weight: 27 g
Silver weight: 26.97 g
Shape: Heptagonal
Composition: 99.9% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard84
Numista: #30565
Value
Exchange value: 1 LVL
Bullion value: $76.68
Inflation-adjusted value: 2.05 LVL

Obverse

Description:
A heptagon centers the Roman numeral I, flanked by the split year MMVII, all set against a background pattern of straight lines forming Roman numeral shapes.
Inscription:
MM VII

LATVIJAS REPUBLIKA
Translation:
MM VII
REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
Script: Latin
Languages: Latin, Latvian

Reverse

Description:
A heptagon with an Oriental pattern features a central "0," the year 2007 to its upper left, and "1 LATS" to its right.
Inscription:
2007

1 LATS
Script: Latin

Edge

Plain

Mints

NameMark
Münze Österreich

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
20072,007Proof

Historical background

In 2007, Latvia was in the final phase of its ambitious journey to adopt the euro, operating under a fixed exchange rate regime established in 2005. The national currency, the lats (LVL), was pegged to the euro within the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II) at a central rate of 0.702804 lats to one euro, with a very narrow fluctuation band of ±1%. This peg was a cornerstone of macroeconomic policy, designed to ensure stability and signal the country's commitment to meeting the Maastricht convergence criteria for eurozone membership. The Bank of Latvia maintained this peg through active currency market interventions, building substantial foreign exchange reserves to defend the fixed rate.

However, this period of formal stability was overshadowed by growing internal economic imbalances. The Latvian economy was overheating, fueled by a massive credit boom and a surge in foreign capital, primarily from Scandinavian banks. This led to double-digit GDP growth but also caused rampant inflation, which peaked at over 14% by the end of 2007—the highest in the European Union. The inflation rate severely conflicted with the Maastricht criterion on price stability, creating a significant obstacle to the planned euro adoption timeline. The widening current account deficit, exceeding 20% of GDP, highlighted an economy consuming far more than it produced, raising concerns about long-term sustainability.

Consequently, while the currency peg itself remained firmly intact and unquestioned in the markets throughout 2007, economists and international institutions like the IMF began issuing strong warnings about the underlying vulnerabilities. The tension between the rigid exchange rate and the need to cool the overheating economy presented a major policy dilemma. Authorities prioritized maintaining the peg as a key anchor, betting that gradual fiscal tightening and administrative measures could control inflation without resorting to devaluation—a strategy that would be severely tested in the global financial crisis that erupted the following year.
Legendary