Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Mint of Finland

10 Euro (Parliamentary Reform) – Finland

Non-circulating coins
Commemoration: 100th Anniversary of Parlimentary Reform
Finland
Context
Year: 2006
Issuer: Finland Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1919)
Currency:
(since 2002)
Total mintage: 30,000
Material
Diameter: 38.6 mm
Weight: 25.5 g
Silver weight: 23.59 g
Shape: Round
Composition: 92.5% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard132
Numista: #13344
Value
Exchange value: 10 EUR = $11.81
Bullion value: $68.42
Inflation-adjusted value: 14.84 EUR

Obverse

Description:
Two hands, equal justice.
Inscription:
2006

100 v

EDUSKUNTAUUDISTUS
Translation:
2006

100 years

PARLIAMENTARY REFORM
Script: Latin
Languages: Finnish, Latin
Engraver: Pertti Mäkinen

Reverse

Description:
Dual faces.
Inscription:
10 EURO

SUOMI FINLAND
Translation:
10 EURO

SUOMI FINLAND
Script: Latin
Languages: English, Finnish, Swedish
Engraver: Pertti Mäkinen

Edge

Partial lettering
Legend:
LANTDAGSREFORMEN 1906
Translation:
The Parliamentary Reform of 1906
Language: Swedish

Mints

NameMark
Mint of Finland

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
200610,000
200620,000Proof

Historical background

In 2006, Finland was a full and established member of the Eurozone, having adopted the euro as its sole legal tender five years earlier in 2002. The period of transition from the Finnish markka (FIM) was complete, and the euro was fully integrated into everyday economic life. The country's monetary policy was no longer determined domestically but by the European Central Bank (ECB) in Frankfurt, which focused on price stability for the entire Eurozone. For Finland, this meant interest rates and broader monetary conditions were set with the needs of a diverse bloc of economies in mind, rather than being tailored specifically to the Finnish economic cycle.

The Finnish economy in 2006 was performing strongly, experiencing robust GDP growth driven by key sectors like technology (notably Nokia), forestry, and metal engineering. This growth, however, created a slight policy tension: while the national economy was booming, the ECB's one-size-fits-all interest rate policy was considered relatively accommodative for Finland's specific conditions. This contributed to rising household debt and a rapidly heating housing market, as low euro-denominated borrowing costs fueled credit growth and increased property prices. There was little public debate about reverting to the markka, but discussions focused on the challenges of managing a national economy within a supranational currency union during a period of asymmetric growth.

Overall, the currency situation was one of stability and successful integration, but with emerging concerns about macroeconomic imbalances. The euro facilitated trade and investment within Finland's most important market, the EU, and provided transactional simplicity. The focus for policymakers had shifted from currency management to navigating the constraints and benefits of Eurozone membership, ensuring fiscal discipline at home, and addressing domestic financial stability risks that were amplified by the common monetary policy. The year was a calm chapter in Finland's euro history, situated between the initial adoption challenges and the far greater stress test that would come with the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the subsequent European debt crisis.
Rare