Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Cyrillius

500 Soʻm (Uzbekistan's Independence) – Uzbekistan

Circulating commemorative coins
Commemoration: 20th Anniversary of Uzbekistan's Independence
Uzbekistan
Context
Year: 2011
Issuer: Uzbekistan Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1991)
Currency:
(since 1994)
Material
Diameter: 25 mm
Weight: 6 g
Thickness: 1.6 mm
Shape: Round
Composition: Steel (Nickel-plated Steel)
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard34
Numista: #26626
Value
Exchange value: 500 UZS

Obverse

Description:
National Coat of Arms with date.
Inscription:
• OʻZBEKISTON MARKAZIY BANKI •

2011
Translation:
THE CENTRAL BANK OF UZBEKISTAN

2011
Script: Latin
Language: Uzbek

Reverse

Description:
Tashkent's Palace of International Symposia.
Inscription:
• OʻZBEKISTON MUSTAQILLIGIGA 20 YIL

500 SOʻM
Translation:
20 Years to the Independence of Uzbekistan

500 Som
Script: Latin
Language: Uzbek

Edge

Plain

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
2011

Historical background

In 2011, Uzbekistan’s currency situation was characterized by a stark and problematic dual exchange rate system. The official exchange rate, set by the Central Bank of Uzbekistan, was artificially strong, hovering around 1,680 Uzbek som (UZS) to the US dollar. However, this rate was inaccessible to most citizens and businesses for meaningful transactions. The real economy operated on a pervasive black market, where the dollar traded for approximately 2,700 to 2,900 UZS, nearly double the official rate. This significant gap created major distortions, incentivizing corruption and rent-seeking as access to cheap dollars at the official rate became a source of immense privilege.

The root causes of this disparity were fundamental economic policies. The government maintained strict capital controls, limiting access to foreign currency for imports and restricting convertibility. This was driven by a desire to control inflation, conserve hard currency reserves for prioritized state-owned enterprises and strategic imports, and maintain a façade of stability. However, the policy severely hampered the private sector and foreign investment, as businesses faced immense difficulty obtaining currency for legitimate operations and repatriating profits. The gap between the rates acted as a hidden tax on the economy, discouraging formal trade and investment.

Consequently, the currency regime in 2011 was a major constraint on Uzbekistan’s economic development. It fostered a large shadow economy, created uncertainty for both domestic and international businesses, and isolated the country from global financial markets. While providing the government with short-term control, the system entrenched inefficiencies and corruption, setting the stage for the profound economic reforms, including currency liberalization, that would begin later in the decade under new leadership.
🌱 Common