Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Numista CC BY
Context
Years: 2000–2006
Issuer: Romania Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1989)
Currency:
(1952—2005)
Demonetized: Yes
Total mintage: 11,000
Material
Diameter: 22.2 mm
Weight: 2 g
Thickness: 2.11 mm
Shape: Round
Composition: Aluminium (75% Magnesium, 25% Aluminium)
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Coin alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↓
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard153
Numista: #2077
Value
Exchange value: 1000 ROL
Inflation-adjusted value: 8033.76 ROL

Obverse

Description:
Bust of Prince Constantin Brancoveanu wearing a headdress.
Inscription:
CONSTANTIN BRANCOVEANU

1688

1714
Translation:
CONSTANTIN BRANCOVEANU

1688

1714
Script: Latin
Languages: Latin, Romanian
Engraver: Vasile Gabor

Reverse

Description:
Value over shield in circled line.
Inscription:
ROMANIA

1000 LEI

20 02
Script: Latin
Engraver: Vasile Gabor

Edge

Smooth with reeded sections

Mints

NameMark
State Mint

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
2000
20004,500Proof
2001
2002
20021,500Proof
2003
20032,000Proof
2004
20042,000Proof
2005Proof
20061,000Proof

Historical background

In the year 2000, Romania's currency situation was characterized by a fragile stabilization following a period of severe crisis. The late 1990s had been tumultuous, culminating in a deep economic and banking crisis in 1998-1999, which severely undermined confidence in the Romanian leu (ROL). This led to high inflation, a significant depreciation of the currency, and the effective collapse of the banking system for many citizens. By the turn of the millennium, the country was operating under a standby agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which imposed strict austerity measures and required a tight monetary policy from the National Bank of Romania (NBR) to restore macroeconomic balance.

The primary focus of monetary authorities in 2000 was on curbing rampant inflation and preventing further dramatic devaluation. Inflation remained stubbornly high, ending the year at approximately 45%, though this was a notable decrease from the triple-digit hyperinflation of the mid-1990s. The NBR maintained a managed float exchange rate regime, intervening in the market to smooth out excessive volatility, but the leu continued to depreciate gradually under pressure from fiscal deficits and lingering lack of confidence. This environment of high inflation and a weakening currency severely eroded purchasing power, creating ongoing hardship for the population.

Looking forward, 2000 was a transitional year setting the stage for more decisive reforms. The government, under renewed IMF pressure, began implementing stricter fiscal discipline and accelerated the restructuring and privatization of loss-making state-owned enterprises. These steps, though painful in the short term, were aimed at creating the conditions for sustainable growth and eventual EU accession. The currency stability achieved was precarious, but it laid the necessary groundwork for the more successful stabilization and denomination (the replacement of the old leu with a new leu at a rate of 10,000:1) that would follow later in the decade.
🌱 Very Common