Logo Title
obverse
reverse
kansal888

100 Rupees (University of Mysore) – India

Non-circulating coins
Commemoration: University of Mysore Centenary Celebrations
India
Context
Year: 2016
Issuer: India Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1950)
Currency:
(since 1957)
Material
Diameter: 44 mm
Weight: 35 g
Silver weight: 17.50 g
Shape: Round
Composition: 50% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard501
Numista: #105620
Value
Exchange value: 100 INR = $1.10
Bullion value: $49.69
Inflation-adjusted value: 160.18 INR

Obverse

Description:
Ashoka pillar with lion capital, value beneath.
Inscription:
भारत INDIA

सत्यमेव जयते

ऱ 100
Translation:
INDIA

Truth Alone Triumphs

₹ 100
Languages: Sanskrit, Hindi

Reverse

Description:
Bust of Maharaja Krishnaraja Wodeyar IV with Crawford Hall in the background.
Inscription:
मैसूर विश्वविध्यालय शताब्दी समारोह

1916 - 2016

University of Mysore Centenary Celebrations
Translation:
University of Mysore Centenary Celebrations

1916 - 2016
Languages: Hindi, Sanskrit

Edge

Reeded

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
2016
2016MProof

Historical background

In 2016, India's currency situation was dominated by a single, seismic event: the demonetization of ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes, announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8th. This policy, which rendered 86% of the currency in circulation by value invalid overnight, was presented as a radical surgical strike against "black money," counterfeit currency, and terror financing. The move aimed to purge illicit cash from the economy, push India towards digital transactions, and widen the tax net by bringing unaccounted wealth into the formal banking system.

The immediate aftermath was one of significant disruption and a severe liquidity crunch. Long queues formed outside banks and ATMs as citizens scrambled to exchange old notes or withdraw the newly introduced ₹500 and ₹2,000 denominations, the supply of which was initially inadequate. The cash-dependent informal sector, which constituted a large part of the economy, was severely impacted, affecting daily wage earners, small traders, and farmers. While the government argued it was a necessary short-term pain for long-term gain, the move sparked intense public debate and criticism over its planning, execution, and the disproportionate burden on ordinary citizens.

By the end of 2016, the economy was still grappling with demonetization's effects. Although a large portion of the invalidated currency was returned to the banking system—raising questions about the primary objective of trapping black money—the government highlighted successes like a surge in digital payments and expanded financial inclusion. However, the full economic impact, including a slowdown in GDP growth in subsequent quarters, was yet to be fully quantified. The year concluded with the currency situation in a state of transition, marked by a profound shock to the system and an uncertain path towards its intended structural benefits.
Rare