Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Image courtesy of Latvijas Banka

1 Lats – Latvia

Circulating commemorative coins
Commemoration: Owl Fibula
Latvia
Context
Year: 2007
Issuer: Latvia Issuer flag
Period:
(since 1991)
Currency:
(1993—2013)
Demonetization: 1 January 2014
Total mintage: 1,000,000
Material
Diameter: 21.75 mm
Weight: 4.8 g
Thickness: 1.8 mm
Shape: Round
Composition: Copper-nickel
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard86
Numista: #12420
Value
Exchange value: 1 LVL
Inflation-adjusted value: 2.05 LVL

Obverse

Description:
The Latvian coat of arms with the year 2007 below is centered, with LATVIJAS arched above and REPUBLIKA arched below.
Inscription:
LATVIJAS

20 07

REPUBLIKA
Translation:
Republic of Latvia

20 07
Script: Latin
Language: Latvian

Reverse

Description:
An owl fibula is centered, flanked by the numeral 1 and the inscription LATS.
Inscription:
1 LATS
Script: Latin

Edge

Two inscriptions LATVIJAS BANKA (Bank of Latvia), separated by rhombic dots.
Legend:
LATVIJAS BANKA ♦ LATVIJAS BANKA ♦
Translation:
LATVIJAS BANKA ♦ LATVIJAS BANKA ♦
Language: Latvian

Categories

Animal> Bird

Mints

NameMark
Münze Österreich

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
20071,000,000

Historical background

In 2007, Latvia was in the final phase of its ambitious journey to adopt the euro, operating under a fixed exchange rate regime established in 2005. The national currency, the lats (LVL), was pegged to the euro within the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II) at a central rate of 0.702804 lats to one euro, with a very narrow fluctuation band of ±1%. This peg was a cornerstone of macroeconomic policy, designed to ensure stability and signal the country's commitment to meeting the Maastricht convergence criteria for eurozone membership. The Bank of Latvia maintained this peg through active currency market interventions, building substantial foreign exchange reserves to defend the fixed rate.

However, this period of formal stability was overshadowed by growing internal economic imbalances. The Latvian economy was overheating, fueled by a massive credit boom and a surge in foreign capital, primarily from Scandinavian banks. This led to double-digit GDP growth but also caused rampant inflation, which peaked at over 14% by the end of 2007—the highest in the European Union. The inflation rate severely conflicted with the Maastricht criterion on price stability, creating a significant obstacle to the planned euro adoption timeline. The widening current account deficit, exceeding 20% of GDP, highlighted an economy consuming far more than it produced, raising concerns about long-term sustainability.

Consequently, while the currency peg itself remained firmly intact and unquestioned in the markets throughout 2007, economists and international institutions like the IMF began issuing strong warnings about the underlying vulnerabilities. The tension between the rigid exchange rate and the need to cool the overheating economy presented a major policy dilemma. Authorities prioritized maintaining the peg as a key anchor, betting that gradual fiscal tightening and administrative measures could control inflation without resorting to devaluation—a strategy that would be severely tested in the global financial crisis that erupted the following year.
🌱 Common