Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Heritage Auctions
Bolivia
Context
Years: 1796–1809
Issuer: Bolivia Issuer flag
Ruler: Charles IV
Currency:
(1574—1825)
Demonetized: Yes
Total mintage: 275,885
Material
Diameter: 11.15 mm
Weight: 0.85 g
Silver weight: 0.76 g
Shape: Round
Composition: 89.6% Silver
Magnetic: No
Technique: Milled
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard82
Numista: #61816
Value
Bullion value: $2.12

Obverse

Description:
Rampant lion crowned.

Reverse

Description:
Mintmark and value flank castle, date below.
Inscription:
PTS ¼

·1809·
Script: Latin

Edge


Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
1796PTS
1797PTS
1798PTS
1799PTS
1800PTS
1801PTS17,000
1802PTS165,000
1803PTS29,000
1804PTS5,724
1805PTS11,000
1806PTS30,000
1807PTS10,000
1808PTS8,161
1809PTS

Historical background

In 1796, the currency situation in the Royal Audience of Charcas (modern Bolivia) was a complex reflection of its role as the economic heart of the Spanish Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. The region's wealth was fundamentally anchored in the silver extracted from the legendary Cerro Rico of Potosí, which minted vast quantities of silver coins, primarily pesos and reales. These coins, stamped with the mint mark "P," circulated globally, making Potosí a central node in the world's monetary system. However, the official Spanish monetary system existed alongside a persistent reality of coin shortage in local markets, driven by the Crown's policy of exporting bullion to Spain and the high cost of imported goods.

The local economy was further complicated by the widespread use of moneda feble (weak or debased coinage). To address chronic shortages of small-denomination coins for everyday transactions, private merchants and local authorities often issued token coins or cut official coins into pieces. These practices, while pragmatic, created confusion and inefficiency, as the value of such currency was unstable and often discounted. The Spanish Crown viewed this informal system with suspicion, as it undermined royal control over the currency and facilitated tax evasion.

Ultimately, the monetary landscape of 1796 was one of stark contrast: immense mineral wealth and a globally significant mint coexisted with local scarcity and improvisation. This tension highlighted the extractive nature of colonial administration, where the primary function of Bolivian silver was to fuel the imperial treasury rather than to develop a robust, integrated local economy. These monetary frustrations contributed to the growing discontent among all social classes, foreshadowing the economic grievances that would fuel the independence movements just a few decades later.
💎 Very Rare