Logo Title
obverse
reverse
Uppsala Universitet, CC0
Denmark
Context
Years: 1966–1972
Issuer: Denmark Issuer flag
Currency:
(since 1873)
Demonetization: 30 September 2008
Total mintage: 105,655,763
Material
Diameter: 23 mm
Weight: 4.3 g
Thickness: 1.49 mm
Composition: Copper-nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel)
Technique: Milled
Alignment: Medal alignment
Obverse
OBVERSE ↑
flip
Reverse
REVERSE ↑
References
KM: #Click to copy to clipboard855
Numista: #971
Value
Exchange value: 0.25 DKK = $0.04
Inflation-adjusted value: 3.02 DKK

Obverse

Description:
Frederik IX monogram left, beech branch right.
Inscription:
FR IX

1967

C ♥ S
Translation:
FR IX
1967
C ♥ S
Script: Latin
Languages: French, English
Engraver: H. Salomon

Reverse

Description:
Value, barley encircling the central hole.
Inscription:
25

ØRE

DANMARK
Translation:
25

ØRE

DENMARK
Script: Latin
Languages: Danish, Norwegian
Engraver: H. Salomon

Edge

Plain

Mints

NameMark
Royal Danish Mint(♥)

Mintings

YearMint MarkMintageQualityCollection
1966C♥S
1967C♥S
1968C♥S39,141,909
1969C♥S16,974,353
1970C♥S5,392,994
1971C♥S12,724,505
1972S♥S31,422,002

Historical background

In 1966, Denmark's currency situation was defined by its participation in the Bretton Woods system, which pegged the Danish krone (DKK) to the US dollar at a fixed rate of 7.5 DKK per 1 USD. This arrangement, managed by the Danish National Bank, required strict monetary discipline to maintain the parity. The primary economic challenge of the mid-1960s was a persistent and growing current account deficit, driven by strong domestic demand, rising wages, and high levels of imports, which put sustained downward pressure on the krone's fixed value.

To defend the peg, Danish authorities relied on a combination of tight monetary policy, occasional foreign exchange interventions, and restrictions on capital flows. High interest rates were used to attract short-term capital inflows and support the currency, but this also risked stifling domestic investment. Furthermore, Denmark had to maintain substantial foreign exchange reserves, often drawing on standby credits from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to bolster confidence in its ability to uphold the fixed exchange rate.

The situation in 1966 was one of underlying strain, setting the stage for the greater turbulence that would follow in the late 1960s. While the peg held firm that year, the structural trade imbalances and the inherent pressures of the Bretton Woods system were becoming increasingly apparent. This period highlighted the difficult balancing act between a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and an independent national economic policy—a tension that would eventually lead to a major devaluation of the krone in 1967 and contribute to the broader collapse of the Bretton Woods system in the early 1970s.
🌱 Very Common